Are you prepared for experiencing a thrilling trip through shark-infested fields of corn? Put on your seat, because "Sharks of the Corn" delivers an exciting mix of horror and comedy. Written by legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra budget-conscious film is a homage to Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) which transforms into an hilarious and hilarious joke that'll have you looking around and rolling around on the floor smiling.
This is a Cornfield Carnival of Chaos
Starting with the seemingly normal cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" reveals its quirky character. The film introduces Gary and Susan the two main characters, who soon fade from the scene in the film, before it veers into some unexpected directions. It weaves together horror elements, with a myriad of subplots. It's an enjoyable mix that could be described as a cornfield fair full of craziness.
A Mentally-ill Shark Enthusiast
In comes Teddy Bo Lucas, a protagonist who adds a new layer of madness to an already awe-inspiring plot. The shark-loving psychopath has an uncanny adoration for these aquatic predators. As if cornfields with sharks were not already bizarre enough Teddy brings his love of sharks to a whole new level when you witness him commit an unimaginable murder in his room at the motel. The twist that is unexpected sets the scene for a storm in intrigue and skepticism.
Inconfusion Cults also known as Sharks
The plot is tense as authorities pin the blame on poor Gary on the day Susan was murdered, despite his lack of motive. The cult of sharks takes over as a distinct subplot that introduces us to some world where cornfields as well as the cult of sharks collide. When you think there's no way to make things more absurd then two inept burglars set out to take away a young shark from this group of people. The film is a tangled mix of humor and horror that will keep you on your toes.
Critiques and Comic Relief
Although "Sharks of the Corn" delivers a distinct and unusual movie, it's also not without the flaws. The film is often a jumble of distinct characters and scenes leading some viewers to feel confused or unable to grasp all the different plotlines. It's a deliberate stylistic choice that helps to enhance the spoof and satirical nature of this film however, it might not be all people's cup of coffee.
The production values in the movie are intentionally low, and the acting falls into the category of unreliable. Even in a sea of poor performances, Steve Guynn shines through with his impressive performance. He actually playing his role instead of merely reciting sentences. It's an exceptional example of authentic acting in a sea of inflated performances.
Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines
"Sharks of the Corn" takes advantage of its budget-friendly nature by using cheap effects that have an attractive charm. Most shark attacks are hilariously performed by hand puppets. These add the humour of the movie. The wacky plot, (blog post) which revolves in a shark cult's plans to revive a goddess of sharks The film can truly show its creativity. The problem is that this creative thinking often can't be translated into an captivating entertainment experience.
Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional
One area where "Sharks of the Corn" fails is the cinematography. Its visuals and framing come to appear amateurish, devoid of the polish and finesse that is typically found in mainstream horror films. While this may be intentional so that the film maintains a budget-conscious look yet it does affect the quality of the experience.
In the final analysis "Sharks of the Corn" is a cult favorite. It's a boring and dull scene that can be difficult to understand of. Low production values complex plotlines, confusing characters, and uncertain acting are likely to turn off the viewers in search of a high-quality horror and comedy. But for those looking to watch negative films as entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" can't provide what they expected in terms of hilarity.Final Rating one "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five
Its low-quality footage, actors, audio and editing techniques "Sharks of the Corn" isn't up to the right note. Even though (blog) it's a riotously fun spoof film, it's not able to offer a cohesive and engaging overall experience. As a critic, I conclude with a hilarious point: movies, like corn, are only better by adding explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" fails to make the grade.